The AI company solving putting.
Run a five-station putting test with a phone and ten balls. Our AI reads your numbers against the cohort, finds the input costing you strokes, and builds practice that holds up on the course.
Analysis. Your start line is above cohort median; the strokes are leaking on speed. 71% of lag putts finished short, and the error grows with distance, which points to under-hit pace rather than a misread. Week 1 targets speed only: three ladder sessions of twelve minutes, spaced, with a re-check Friday.
Five stations. One number per problem.
The industry measures the stroke. We measure the golfer. Each station isolates one input, so the analysis can say what to fix instead of what's wrong.
Speed
Thirty putts to 15, 25 and 35 feet. We map where every ball stops, and whether your error grows with distance.
Start line
Ten six-footers through a gate just wider than the ball. Face angle, isolated.
The read
Commit to an aim point before every putt. Miss side versus intended line.
Pressure
Six-footers with a consequence. A miss resets the count. Longest streak wins.
Calibration
Predict your score before each station. Then we measure the gap. Feel, quantified.
Your numbers, turned into a practice architecture.
Every putting product ends at the diagnosis. The audit starts there. The AI reads your battery against the cohort, and a curriculum designer with seventeen years in learning science turns it into four weeks of practice sized to the time you actually have.
- The battery, guided. Setup video, scoring sheet, submission form.
- The analysis. Your profile versus the cohort. Which input is leaking strokes, and by how much.
- The architecture. Four weeks of spaced, varied, pressure-loaded practice.
- The call. Forty-five minutes with the person who wrote it.
- The re-test. Same battery at week four. Before and after, in numbers.
Measure. Prescribe. Re-test.
The loop that every other putting product skips, because it's the part that can be checked.
Measure
Twenty minutes, five stations, a phone and ten balls. The battery replaces "did it go in" with two questions you can answer: did it start where you meant, and finish at the pace you meant.
Prescribe
AI analysis against the cohort, then practice built on the research golf skipped: spacing, interleaving, external focus, pressure inoculation. Sized to a Tuesday night, not a tour schedule.
Re-test
Same battery, four weeks later. Every audit produces a before and after. Every before and after makes the next golfer's benchmark smarter. The dataset is the product.
Putting, covered like it matters.
The physics, the mind, the practice science, and the economics of the most profitable niche in golf. Written for the golfer who reads the Journal and listens to Acquired.
40% of shots, 15% of the gap
The strokes-gained crowd is right about putting's share of the scoring difference. They're missing that it's the highest-return practice hour in the game.
The missed putt is the wrong place to start
Tour players miss six of ten from ten feet. If you miss seven and blame your stroke, you drew the wrong conclusion from an expected result.
The amateur data desert
ShotLink measures a tour pro's every putt to the inch. You have one number, and it's the worst putting stat there is.
Find out what's costing you strokes.
The five-station battery, the scoring sheet, and your place in the benchmark. Then one piece a week on putting, and nothing else.